It is the oldest advice in real estate and it is broadly right — with two conditions that decide whether it works for you.
You can change almost everything about a house. You cannot change where it is. Location sets a floor under the value, and surrounding homes pull a modest property up rather than dragging a grand one down.
The reverse is the genuine risk. The most expensive house on a modest street is capped by its neighbours — buyers looking at that price point look at better streets, and buyers looking at that street will not pay that price. Those homes sit, and they sell at a discount to what was spent on them. We see it most often with heavily over-renovated homes in ordinary communities.
Cosmetically dated, tired kitchen, bad paint, ugly landscaping — all fixable, and all reasons a house sits while better-presented ones sell. That is the opportunity.
Cheap for a permanent reason is different. Backing an arterial, an awkward layout that cannot be reworked, a tiny lot, a fundamental structural problem — those follow you to resale, and you will be selling to a buyer as reluctant as the one you were.
Buying the cheapest house and having nothing left is how people end up living in the problem for a decade. Budget for the work before you commit to the purchase, not after.
Neighbourhood, for resale. House, for your life. Those pull in different directions and the honest answer is that you are choosing a balance rather than a winner.
The reconciliation we suggest to clients: choose the location first, then take the best house your budget allows within it — even if that means less space than the same money buys somewhere else. Space is the easiest thing to be talked into and the least likely to matter in five years.
We have rarely met anyone who regretted buying a slightly smaller house in the right community. We meet people who regret the opposite regularly, and it usually surfaces about two years in.
It works well in the established inner-ring communities, where the land carries much of the value and older homes sit alongside new infills. An original bungalow on a good street in an area attracting redevelopment has a floor under it that a comparable house in a less-sought community does not.
It works less well in newer suburban communities, where homes are similar in age and finish and there is not much gap between cheapest and dearest. The strategy needs a spread to exploit, and uniform communities do not have one.